Marketalyx
⚠ Educational tool. Not financial advice or an investment recommendation. Investing carries the risk of losing all your capital. You act at your own risk. Risk warning

Rocket Lab Corporation RKLB

Industrials · Aerospace & Defense · United States · Nasdaq-100

60
Profitability
0
Growth
100
Valuation
33
Financial strength
100
Momentum
67

Based on the available data, Rocket Lab Corporation gets an algorithmic score of 60/100. It trades at 69.70 $, with a bearish technical trend (RSI 50.9) and 93.7% annual volatility.

Updated: 2026-09-30

Open in the interactive tool →

Strengths

  • Sustained revenue growth (41.8% compound annual).
  • Low-debt balance sheet.

Weaknesses

  • Low ROE (-7.9%).
  • Thin net margin (-21.5%): vulnerable to costs.
  • Negative free cash flow.
  • Demanding valuation (P/E 1529.9): the market prices in a lot of growth.
  • High beta (1.85): amplifies index moves.

Fundamentals

Forward P/E1,529.85
P/B11.94
EV/EBITDA-262.67
P/S57.94
ROE %-7.92
ROA %-4.62
Gross margin %37.26
Operating margin %-24.57
Net margin %-21.51
Revenue growth % (y/y)62.00
Revenue CAGR %41.82
Debt/Equity %3.83
Current ratio5.48
FCF yield %-0.72
Dividend yield %0.00
Payout %0.00

Returns

1 month+8.2 %
3 months-31.4 %
6 months+21.5 %
YTD-8.3 %
1 year+50.7 %
3 years+1,455.8 %
5 years+381.7 %

Risk

1-year volatility93.7 %
Beta1.85
5-year max drawdown-78.3 %
Sharpe 1A0.85

Macroeconomic context

Cyclical: depends on manufacturing PMI, infrastructure investment and defence spending. Sensitive to energy prices and supply chains. As a US company, its valuation depends on the Fed, 10-year Treasury yields and the US earnings cycle.

How the score is calculated

The score combines profitability (ROE, ROA, net margin), growth (revenue and earnings), valuation (P/E, EV/EBITDA, free cash flow), financial strength (debt and liquidity; not applied to banks and insurers) and momentum (6 and 12-month returns and trend). It is an educational quantitative filter, not a buy or sell recommendation.

See the full Nasdaq-100 ranking →